<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cursing in blog posts &#8211; do you mind it?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chrispund.com/cursing-in-blog-posts-do-you-mind-it/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chrispund.com/cursing-in-blog-posts-do-you-mind-it</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:03:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://chrispund.com/cursing-in-blog-posts-do-you-mind-it/comment-page-1#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrispund.com/?p=11#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Dan - thanks for the great comment. I agree if &#039;fuck&#039; popped up in the WSJ a couple times in an article, most people would have an issue with it. A professional publication like that you wouldn&#039;t expect to throw around that kind of language. But your also right in saying I think it could have a negative effect. As with anything I publish, I like to recheck it, double check it again, then leave it and come back to it for a fresh look. I think you&#039;ll find a couple &#039;bad&#039; words start popping into some posts, but nothing to aggressive or offensive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan &#8211; thanks for the great comment. I agree if &#8216;fuck&#8217; popped up in the WSJ a couple times in an article, most people would have an issue with it. A professional publication like that you wouldn&#8217;t expect to throw around that kind of language. But your also right in saying I think it could have a negative effect. As with anything I publish, I like to recheck it, double check it again, then leave it and come back to it for a fresh look. I think you&#8217;ll find a couple &#8216;bad&#8217; words start popping into some posts, but nothing to aggressive or offensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Burdi</title>
		<link>http://chrispund.com/cursing-in-blog-posts-do-you-mind-it/comment-page-1#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Burdi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 05:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrispund.com/?p=11#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Chris, I think this really depends on how the audience feels.  I think that what you are doing asking is a major step to make a decision like this.  When you say Naomi&#039;s audience &quot;loves it&quot; can you qualify that somehow?  It seems like if you are asking you may think it will have a negative effect and if there is no proof that it would be &quot;loved&quot; is it worth it?

I personally don&#039;t think I would care but at the same time, if I was reading the WSJ or the NY Times and it came up I don&#039;t know if I would find the author or the article credible.  What do you think?

Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, I think this really depends on how the audience feels.  I think that what you are doing asking is a major step to make a decision like this.  When you say Naomi&#8217;s audience &#8220;loves it&#8221; can you qualify that somehow?  It seems like if you are asking you may think it will have a negative effect and if there is no proof that it would be &#8220;loved&#8221; is it worth it?</p>
<p>I personally don&#8217;t think I would care but at the same time, if I was reading the WSJ or the NY Times and it came up I don&#8217;t know if I would find the author or the article credible.  What do you think?</p>
<p>Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
